Frameworks · MAD™ · Method note

How the Market Authority Diamond is scored.

Every MAD™ score Studio JNSQ issues, whether a client scores themselves or a strategist reads them from the outside, is produced the same way. This note publishes that way, so a score can be checked rather than taken on trust.

Studio JNSQ · Version 1.0 · 18 September 2026

Back to MAD™, explained

1 · The instrument

Four facets and a centering point. Forty four items, 220 points at most.

Four facets sit on the axes and one centering point in the middle. It is never described as five facets: Branding is the centre that decides what must be true for the other four to hold.

Demand

Top, the outcome. Does work arrive without a relationship carrying it in?

8 items · out of 40

Credibility

Left, the proof. Is there proof a stranger would accept?

8 items · out of 40

Visibility

Right, the presence. Do the right people encounter this company where decisions are made?

10 items · out of 50

Market Trust

Bottom, the foundation. Does regard reach beyond the people who already know them?

8 items · out of 40

Branding

Centre, the centering point. Can the market say what this company is, without help?

10 items · out of 50

The instrument, its items and its anchors are owned by Jerico Lugo and used by Studio JNSQ under licence. The item-by-item anchors are held in the firm’s scoring guide and applied by every strategist; this note carries the rules and the arithmetic, which are what a reader needs to check a result.

2 · Scoring an item

One to five, against written anchors.

Each item is scored from one to five, and every item carries a written description of what a 1, a 3 and a 5 look like. A 2 clearly passes 1 but does not fully meet 3; a 4 fully meets 3 and shows some, but not all, of 5. When a scorer is torn between two numbers, the lower one is taken and the reason is written down.

Every score needs evidence. A link, a screenshot or a search result with its date sits next to every number. A score without evidence is not a score. What a friend of the subject would say does not matter; what matters is what a stranger can find.

When nothing can be found. Most items describe things the public can see. For those, no evidence means a score of 1: in an external read, absence is the finding. A smaller set of items describes what happens inside a company, such as retention, pipeline and acquisition cost. Those are scored from the nearest public sign, with the confidence marked low; where there is no sign at all they score 3 and are flagged as not observable, because a company is not punished for what the public simply cannot see.

Unanswered is not the middle. In the self-assessment, an item left unanswered scores 1, never a middle value. An untouched facet reads low rather than average, and the report says so.

Every facet carries a confidence level: high when most scores rest on direct public evidence, medium when many rest on nearby signs, low when most rest on inference. Demand is almost always low in an external read, and the read says that plainly.

3 · The arithmetic

Five percentages, one mean.

01

Add the item scores in each part.

That is the raw score: Visibility and Branding out of 50; Credibility, Market Trust and Demand out of 40.

02

Divide each raw score by its maximum.

Express it as a percentage. Five percentages: the four facets and the centering point.

03

Take the unweighted mean of the five.

The 220 points are never pooled and divided. The mean stops the two larger parts from deciding the number, and it is why a company cannot lift its score by pouring everything into one arm. Round to the nearest whole number; a half rounds up.

Worked example. Visibility 16 of 50 is 32%. Branding 17 of 50 is 34%. Credibility 15 of 40 is 37.5%. Market Trust 14 of 40 is 35%. Demand 15 of 40 is 37.5%. The mean is 35.2, so the headline is 35, Early Stage.

4 · The stage bands

Five fixed bands, for every part and for the headline.

Early Stage

The market has little to go on. Most of what is true about the subject is not yet visible to a stranger.

0 to 36

Developing

Some proof and presence exist, unevenly. The diamond leans, and the lean is the finding.

37 to 59

Emerging

A stranger would find enough to take a meeting. The gaps are specific rather than general.

60 to 70

Strong

Authority holds across most surfaces; the remaining work is consolidation.

71 to 85

Elite

The market describes the subject in the subject’s own words, without help.

86 and up

The same bands apply in the self-assessment, in the strategist consultation and in every external read. Earlier editions used different cut-offs; reads issued before 17 September 2026 carry the bands printed on them and are not restated.

5 · Two ways it is run

Self-assessment, and the read from outside.

The diagnostic

The self-assessment at /diagnostic: the subject answers the 44 items about themselves. Fast, and honest about what it is, a view from inside. Its value is the shape of the diamond and the conversation that follows in a strategist consultation.

The external market read

The same instrument scored by a Studio JNSQ strategist from what the market can establish. Nothing from the subject is ever scored as external evidence; the subject’s own claims are recorded as claims and tested. Every score carries its source and date. A strategist reviews and approves before it is issued; nothing is published automatically. Where a self-assessment exists, the read carries both diamonds and the gap between them.

The Career Equity Archetype

The same instrument read at the scale of one person, at /archetypes: a fifteen-item finder that places a person in one of sixteen archetypes. The same facets, the same centre.

6 · What it is not, and versions

A reading of market authority, not a valuation. Versioned, never edited in place.

MAD™ measures market authority, which is one component of brand equity. It is not a brand valuation, not a branding audit and not a brand architecture review. A score is a snapshot on a date; the evidence behind it ages, and a read is re-scored rather than edited when the evidence changes. For a service business the companion instrument is the Resource Value Formula™, with its own method note.

Versions

  • 1.0 · 18 September 2026First public edition. Carries the five stage bands ruled on 17 September 2026, the rule that an unanswered item scores 1, and the four-facets-and-a-centering-point description.

When the method changes, a new version is issued with a dated line here, and reports name the version they were scored under. Questions about a score, or a request for the evidence behind one, go to strategy@studiojnsq.com.

Market Authority Diamond™, its items and anchors: © Jerico Lugo. Used by Studio JNSQ under licence.

See the method applied

Score yourself, then see how a stranger would score you.

The snapshot is free and takes a few minutes. An external read is scored by a strategist from what the market can find.